SoleCRISTransition linkFrontpageTransition linkInstructionsTransition linkLogin Bank of Finland

A Peer-reviewed scientific articles/A1 Journal article (refereed), original research
This is the view page of publication. On this page you can view basic information of publication or go back on previous page using back-action on the bottom of the page. If you want to move to edit the information of publication, use the actions on the bottom of the page or continue using the system from menu.

Do Bailouts Cause Moral Hazards or Franchise Value in Banking?, Kyklos 1, February (2014). Kauko, Karlo

Category A Peer-reviewed scientific articles
Sub-category A1 Journal article (refereed), original research
auki Internal authors
All authors as text Kauko, Karlo 
Number of authors
Status Published
Year of publication 2014 
Date 01.01.2014 
Name of article Do Bailouts Cause Moral Hazards or Franchise Value in Banking? 
Name of journal Kyklos
Volume of issue 67 
Number of issue 1, February 
Pages 82–92 
Abstract Governmental safety nets are said to be a major source of moral hazard in banking. If profits are private but losses are borne by taxpayers, banks have perverted incentives to take excessive risks. Cordella and Levy Yeyati (2003) presented an opposing hypothesis. Safety nets offered during turbulent times help banks to survive and may increase banks' franchise value. This induces stronger risk aversion. This unorthodox hypothesis is tested with a cross‐national comparison. National banking crises in 1981–2003 were handled by national authorities in different ways, and countries may have built reputations as tough or generous crisis managers. The recent financial crisis was less severe in countries where the government had offered blanket guarantees in previous crises, which may be interpreted as a sign of stronger risk aversion during the pre‐2007 build‐up phase. Moreover, losses suffered by depositors in past crises made the recent crisis worse. These findings are consistent with the franchise value hypothesis but in strict contradiction with the mainstream moral hazard argumentation. The finding is politically unpopular and based on relatively few observations, but it is statistically significant and robust to the inclusion of numerous control variables.
JEL-codes G01; G21; E32 
ISSN / e-ISSN 0023-5962 
auki Internet addresses